Static export generated 2026-07-31 07:45Z from the private Meridian research build — every value keeps its own as-of timestamp and provenance label; search, filters and admin actions are inactive in this copy. Private academic review only — not for redistribution.
MERIDIAN Regulatory & Corporate Impact Intelligence — personal research build
Data coverage is not complete: 3 source(s) failing; 24 open coverage incident(s); 1 source(s) awaiting credentials; 3 source(s) unverified. Details on the Source Health page — gaps are shown, never concealed.

Compass Group

Identity (GLEIF Global LEI Index)

FieldValueClass
Legal nameCompass GroupSF
LEIUnavailableSF
Swiss UIDNot in GLEIF recordSF
JurisdictionUnavailableSF
Legal addressUnavailableSF
Headquarters SF
Entity statusUnavailableSF
Geneva connectionunresolvedCM

Listed securities (SIX Swiss Exchange issuer directory)

ISINTickerMICShare classSegmentAccounting standardNext GMAuditorProv.
CPGnot announced

Market snapshot

31.59 USD
Stale — 14 days old · delayed per exchange agreement · yahoo

MetricValueClass
SMA 2032.15CM
SMA 5032.16CM
52-week range position81% of range 20.35–34.18CM
Trend (SMA20 vs SMA50)sidewaysCM
History depth254 daily barsSF

Analyst price targets

LowMeanMedianHighAnalystsProviderAs of
31.038.402739.87549.05420yahoo_analyst2026-07-19T01:09:59Z

Consensus recommendation (provider-published): buy

Financials (latest reported period)

Most recent reported income-statement figures (company disclosure redistributed by the named source); absent figures stay absent — never estimated.

Period ending 2025-09-30 (annual) · reported in USD

MetricValueClass
Revenue46.1B USDSF
Gross profit15.4B USDSF
Operating income3.3B USDSF
EBITDA4.2B USDSF
Net income1.9B USDSF
EPS1.10SF
2 further data fields this platform tracks — no connected source covers this issuer yet. Shown to demonstrate capacity; each populates automatically when a source does, and nothing is estimated in the meantime. Show what is tracked ›

Recent company events

News, insider transactions, congressional trading disclosures and analyst-estimate snapshots from connected sources, each with provenance. Analyst estimates are forecasts — never price targets.

No company events ingested yet — the FMP rotation families (news, insider transactions, congressional disclosures, analyst estimates) populate this once a key is configured. Nothing is invented in the meantime.

Segment & geographic revenue (company disclosures)

Figures parsed from filings and redistributed by the named provider; values are shown as reported and shares are Calculated Metrics with the formula in the column header.

No disclosed segment or geographic revenue ingested for this company yet. The Business Quant pipeline (SEC-parsed company disclosures) reaches US-listed issuers progressively within its daily budget; issuers that do not disclose segment detail keep this honest state.

How the company makes money

Business description and sector are sourced facts (Yahoo assetProfile / Wikidata / Wikipedia — source named per value); the registry-disclosed purpose follows. Disclosed segment/geographic revenue appears in the card above when the issuer reports it; official EDGAR-XBRL and ESEF facts feed the financials card since 2026-07-07. Nothing is estimated in the meantime.

Compass Group plc is a British multinational contract foodservice company headquartered in Chertsey, England. It is the largest contract foodservice company in Europe, employing over 590,000 people as of September 2025. It serves meals in locations including offices and factories, schools, universities, hospitals, major sports and cultural venues, mining camps, prisons and offshore oil platforms. Compass Group is listed on the London Stock Exchange, as a constituent of the FTSE 100 Index. As of July 2025, it has one of the highest market capitalisations on the London Stock Exchange. SF
source: wikipedia · retrieved 2026-07-19

Sector: food service peers

Registry-disclosed purpose: Access currently requires credentials — the Swiss registry (Zefix) API returned HTTP 401 anonymously (verified 2026-07-02); registered-purpose text will populate once free Zefix credentials are configured in .env.

Regulators of highest concern

Ranked by maximum applicability of evidence-backed matches; when none exist yet, the jurisdictional supervision context derived from listing venue/domicile is shown instead — labelled, never asserted as a match.

AuthorityJur.MatchesMax applicabilityMax confidence
us_congressUS390.650.78
EU Publications Office (EU law)EU80.650.78
Health and Human Services DepartmentUS80.650.78
Environmental Protection AgencyUS80.650.78
Agriculture DepartmentUS50.650.78
uk_national_archivesGB40.650.78
SECO / WBF (Swiss sanctions & trade)CH10.650.78
Commodity Futures Trading CommissionUS10.650.78
Commerce DepartmentUS10.650.78

Regulatory exposure — matches with evidence

The price-impact column is a LABELLED INFERENCE (EBI): reasoning about whether and why the exposure could bear on the share price, derived from the regulation's type, region and topic and the match layer/direction. It is not an asserted fact and states no magnitude; the Applicability/Confidence/Exposure figures and the linked evidence remain the sourced basis.

RuleInstrumentRelationshipApplicabilityConfidenceExposurePotential price impact (inference)Review
R-SECTOR-MARKET_CONDUCTSwiss Takeover Board: Beat Fellmann’s term of office extended by one yearsector_topic_candidate_market_conduct0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a Swiss market-conduct measure: if it applied it could raise conduct and compliance costs, or restrict certain market activities, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREThe Access to the Countryside (Coastal Margin) (Bawdsey to Aldeburgh) Order 2026sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a UK food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREFluoxapiprolin; Pesticide Tolerancessector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREEpyrifenacil; Pesticide Tolerancessector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREChlormequat Chloride; Pesticide Tolerancessector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREDiflufenican; Pesticide Tolerancessector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREMedical Devices; Anesthesiology Devices; Classification of the Monitor for Opioid Induced sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREMedical Devices; General and Plastic Surgery Devices; Classification of the Skin Patch forsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREMedical Devices; Orthopedic Devices; Classification of the Medial Knee Implanted Shock Abssector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURETechnical Guidelines for the Production of Regenerative Agricultural Biofuel Feedstockssector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREAir Plan Approval; Ohio; Source-Specific Non-CTG RACT and SIP Strengthening for Ohiosector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURECinnamaldehyde in Pesticide Formulations; Exemption From the Requirement for a Tolerancesector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREMedical Devices; General Hospital and Personal Use Devices; Classification of the Infant Ssector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREMedical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the External Lower Extremity Nervsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREDirect Multifamily Housing Subsequent Loans for Acquisitionsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREOrganization, Functions, and Procedures; Public Notice and Comment for Standards, Criteriasector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREEstablishment Registration and Product Listing for Tobacco Productssector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURESterigenics U.S., LLC; Filing of Food Additive Petitionsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREAgricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act of 1978sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-MARKET_CONDUCTRequest for Comment on the Extension of Standard Futures Contracts to 24/7 Trading and on sector_topic_candidate_market_conduct0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US market-conduct measure: if it applied it could raise conduct and compliance costs, or restrict certain market activities, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURECotton Board Rules and Regulations: Adjusting Supplemental Assessment on Imports (2025 Amesector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREReceipt of Pesticide Petitions Filed for Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREReceipt of Pesticide Petitions Filed for Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURECELEX:32026R1427: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1427 of 2 July 2026 authorisector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a EU food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURECELEX:32026R1463: Council Regulation (EU) 2026/1463 of 25 June 2026 amending Regulation (Esector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a EU food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURECELEX:32026R1465: Council Regulation (EU) 2026/1465 of 25 June 2026 amending Regulation (Esector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a EU food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURECELEX:22026D1370: Decision No 1/2026 of the Joint Committee of 2 June 2026 on the amendmensector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a EU food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURECELEX:32026R1507: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1507 of 3 July 2026 authorisector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a EU food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREThe Agriculture (Student Fees) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2026sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a UK food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURENew Animal Drugs; Approval of New Animal Drug Applications; Withdrawal of Approval of New sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREPribilof Islands Administration; Dogs Prohibitedsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 9528 (119th Congress): People Over Poison Actsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 3457 (119th Congress): To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 with respect to the feralsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHRES 1361 (119th Congress): Expressing support for the recognition of July 3 through July sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHRES 446 (119th Congress): Expressing support for the recognition of July 3 through July 1sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 9593 (119th Congress): To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit thsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 9594 (119th Congress): To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to ban the usesector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 9586 (119th Congress): Delivering Priority Legislation Actsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 5684 (119th Congress): Medical Foods and Formulas Access Act of 2025sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 3930 (119th Congress): Roadless Area Conservation Act of 2025sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 9581 (119th Congress): Fresh Bucks for Fresh Produce Actsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 9535 (119th Congress): Securing Agriculture's Workforce Act of 2026sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4832 (119th Congress): SNAP Tribal Food Sovereignty Act of 2026sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4906 (119th Congress): Milk From Family Dairies Act of 2026sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4887 (119th Congress): Hazardous Fuels Transportation Assistance Act of 2026sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4893 (119th Congress): U.S. Swine Health Improvement Plan Act of 2026sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4896 (119th Congress): Child Care Innovation Advancement Act of 2026sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4904 (119th Congress): Risk-based Oversight for Integrity Actsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4923 (119th Congress): Food Assurance and Security Actsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4912 (119th Congress): BUFFER Actsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 7587 (119th Congress): United States-Israel Agriculture Cooperation Improvement and Expsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4853 (119th Congress): United States-Israel Agriculture Cooperation Improvement and Expasector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-MARKET_CONDUCTHR 3402 (119th Congress): To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require certain sector_topic_candidate_market_conduct0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US market-conduct measure: if it applied it could raise conduct and compliance costs, or restrict certain market activities, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 8147 (119th Congress): Prioritizing Rural Broadband Affordability Actsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4785 (119th Congress): FDPIR Tribal Food Sovereignty Act of 2026sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 9423 (119th Congress): Organic Imports Verification Act of 2026sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 1398 (119th Congress): Organic Imports Verification Act of 2025sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4811 (119th Congress): Tribal Conservation Priorities Inclusion Actsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4862 (119th Congress): A bill to direct the Secretary of Agriculture to consider certainsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4860 (119th Congress): CHILE Act of 2026sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 9357 (119th Congress): Paraquat Prevention Actsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4779 (119th Congress): A bill to support nutrition, farmers, the seafood industry, agricsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 9572 (119th Congress): To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to clarify land eligible sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 7567 (119th Congress): Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 9377 (119th Congress): Protecting America’s Herds Actsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4780 (119th Congress): A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude micrsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4866 (119th Congress): Farmers’ Market Local Revitalization Act of 2026sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 4867 (119th Congress): Small Farm Conservation Actsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREHR 9425 (119th Congress): Increasing Tribal Input on Nutrition Act of 2026sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURES 3236 (119th Congress): Increasing Tribal Input on Nutrition Act of 2025sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a US food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed. The measure is proposed / not yet in force, so any impact would be prospective and contingent on adoption.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-MARKET_CONDUCTCELEX:32026R0788: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/788 of 8 April 2026 amending Dsector_topic_candidate_market_conduct0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a EU market-conduct measure: if it applied it could raise conduct and compliance costs, or restrict certain market activities, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURECELEX:32026R1700: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1700 of 14 July 2026 amendisector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a EU food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTURECELEX:32026R1698: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1698 of 10 July 2026 providsector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a EU food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREThe Access to the Countryside (Coastal Margin) (Silecroft to Silverdale) (No. 2) Order 202sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a UK food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review
R-SECTOR-FOOD_AGRICULTUREThe Access to the Countryside (Coastal Margin) (Harwich to Shotley Gate) (No. 1) Order 202sector_topic_candidate_food_agriculture0.650.78Insufficient evidence to calculateEBI Limited direct impact. An indirect topical (candidate) link to a UK food / agriculture measure: if it applied it could raise product-compliance costs or restrict product and market access, but any effect would be indirect and is unconfirmed.
Inference from the match's regulation type, region and topic — not an asserted fact; no magnitude implied.
needs_review

Recent filings — potential impact inputs

A filing flags potential impact only via evidence-backed matching between its disclosed content and tracked measures.

FiledFormTitleDocument
2026-05-158-K8-K — Compass, Inc.document
2026-05-0810-Q10-Q — Compass, Inc.document
2026-05-058-K8-K — Compass, Inc.document
2026-04-178-K8-K — Compass, Inc.document
2026-02-2710-K10-K — Compass, Inc.document
2026-02-268-K8-K — Compass, Inc.document
2026-02-238-K8-K — Compass, Inc.document
2026-01-098-K8-K — Compass, Inc.document
2026-01-088-K8-K — Compass, Inc.document
2026-01-078-K8-K — Compass, Inc.document