The six platforms in this portfolio are presented here as case studies in regulatory judgement, not as products. Each one follows the same arc: a compliance failure mode a regulated business actually faces → the control I designed for it → the legal and regulatory reasoning behind that control → the working software that proves the reasoning holds. The law leads; the build is the evidence.
These are specialisms of one person, not separate profiles — the CV sets out the career in outline, and what follows is the detail underneath it.
Sanctions and AML regimes attach to named parties — value hides in third parties. A 23-engine forensic workbench for beneficial-ownership tracing, sanctions & adverse-media screening and deterministic peel-chain analysis, exact to the last unit.
Horizon-scanning tells you a rule changed; the board asks whether it hits us and how hard. A provenance-first intelligence platform where every figure carries its source, timestamp and confidence class — and gaps are shown, never invented.
A forecast you cannot defend is a risk, not a plan. A dependency-free forecasting engine that shows its error before its forecast — models chosen by back-tested performance on rolling origins, never by fashion.
Regulatory programmes miss statutory dates on sequencing and capacity, not intent. A scheduling engine that turns a written brief into a live programme — log a delay and every view re-plans, keeping the record of why.
Is this cross-border transfer lawful — and can you prove it? Three regimes in one rules engine (EU GDPR Chapter V, Swiss FADP, UK GDPR), a Schrems II-style transfer impact assessment, and an audit-ready exportable record.
Two bodies of law, almost never assessed together: lawful to build and use (EU AI Act) and lawful to move (dual-use export controls). Sentinel answers both in one deterministic pass, with an audit-ready control record.
